1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> This will convert the status of all bugs using the following |
4 |
> system: |
5 |
|
6 |
> "NEW" will become "CONFIRMED" |
7 |
|
8 |
Weird. How can a newly added bug be "CONFIRMED", unless someone has |
9 |
taken some action to confirm it? |
10 |
|
11 |
> This change will be immediate. The history of each bug will also be |
12 |
> changed so that it appears that these statuses were always in |
13 |
> existence. |
14 |
|
15 |
So all bugs currently marked as "NEW" or "REOPENED" will change their |
16 |
status to "CONFIRMED"? That doesn't look right to me. Would that |
17 |
status change be visible in the bug's history? |
18 |
|
19 |
> So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to keep the old? |
20 |
|
21 |
If the new workflow implies such status changes on existing bugs, then |
22 |
keep the old one please. |
23 |
|
24 |
Ulrich |