| 1 |
On 08/31/2012 03:18 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> For optional dependencies, I'm pretty happy with the "runtime-switchable |
| 5 |
>> USE flags" proposal: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> https://gist.github.com/2945569 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It sounds |
| 10 |
> like using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
All suggested deps are not equal, so USE flags give you the ability to |
| 13 |
pick and choose the ones that you want. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I think SDEPEND is a much simpler approach to the issue, why |
| 16 |
> introducing a new kind of USE flags to address what really belongs to |
| 17 |
> *DEPEND? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I guess we could combine the two ideas if we allow USE conditionals |
| 20 |
inside SDEPEND. |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Zac |
Archives