| 1 |
On Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:21 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | Possibilities for it include: |
| 4 |
> | app-architecture (apps for designing things or archetecture specific |
| 5 |
> | programs?) app-archive |
| 6 |
> | |
| 7 |
> | possibly others, seems like renaming to app-archive would clear that |
| 8 |
> | up and 3 letters isnt _that_ much to ask :/ |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Read the metadata.xml :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
"app-architecture" was my the interpretation of "app-arch" until I read this |
| 13 |
thread, so Dan isn't alone in his feelings towards that name. app-archive |
| 14 |
would seem to make the most sense. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Looking at other categories, app-benchmarks is much more clear than app-benc. |
| 17 |
Similarly, app-anti could also be construed as a variety of things, just as I |
| 18 |
believe app-lap would tend to invite carefully placed comments to the |
| 19 |
developers at opportune moments. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
"RTM" is always an easy answer, but renaming the category would be more |
| 22 |
helpful. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Anthony Gorecki |
| 27 |
Ectro-Linux Foundation |
Archives