1 |
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 10:21, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 09:00, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:17:06 -0500 Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |
4 |
> > wrote: |
5 |
> > | I've posted GLEP 19 which talks about the inclusion of a new 'stable' |
6 |
> > | tree in portage that is updated on a periodic basis and only contains |
7 |
> > | security and major bugfixes out of cycle. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Something that just occured to me... Do most upstreams keep old versions |
10 |
> > of packages available for several years? Or would we have to mirror all |
11 |
> > distfiles rather than just our current small subset? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would think that we would need to mirror everything that is provided |
14 |
> in the stable tree. |
15 |
|
16 |
It's pretty easy to imagine things with licenses that prohibit mirroring |
17 |
would be difficult, if not impossible, to have in our stable tree. |
18 |
|
19 |
Donnie |