1 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 12:04:43 +0200 Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera |
2 |
(klondike) wrote: |
3 |
> El 09/08/15 a las 12:02, Mike Frysinger escribió: |
4 |
> > On 09 Aug 2015 11:31, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: |
5 |
> >> * Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr: |
6 |
> >>> On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
7 |
> >>>> I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the |
8 |
> >>>> entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. |
9 |
> >>> Thanks a lot! |
10 |
> >>> |
11 |
> >>> use case: my cvs tree had uncommitted ebuild work (yes, you caught me |
12 |
> >>> actually doing something). |
13 |
> >>> now `cvs diff` no longer works, how can i track down my local changes? |
14 |
> >>> besides diffing against git tree, brain memory aka shell history and |
15 |
> >>> find -newer? |
16 |
> >> I'd say: |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> >> - tar your *.ebuild and files/* stuff away |
19 |
> >> - then "git clone" the new git repo. |
20 |
> >> - untar your files in the new git repo |
21 |
> >> - use "git diff" |
22 |
> > there will be a ton of cvs keyword noise in there though. need to run |
23 |
> > a sed on the files to clear it out. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > it also will include noise where your local checkout was behind the latest |
26 |
> > tree, so it'll only really work if you ran `cvs up` in the whole tree just |
27 |
> > before it was shutdown. |
28 |
> > -mike |
29 |
> Out of curiosity, is it impossible to have a read only CVS server with |
30 |
> the state at the time of the freeze? |
31 |
|
32 |
Seconded here. Read-only CVS should not consume much resources, but |
33 |
will facilitate migration. |
34 |
|
35 |
Best regards, |
36 |
Andrew Savchenko |