Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:11:54
Message-Id: 52AB5BDF.1090808@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Brian Dolbec
1 On 12/13/2013 04:53 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2 > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 17:08 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
3 >> Sergey Popov wrote:
4 >>>>>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died
5 >>>>>
6 >>>>> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say
7 >>>>
8 >>>> Define dead?
9 >>>
10 >>> Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private
11 >>> e-mails or in maillists.
12 >>
13 >> Define very long time?
14 >>
15 >>
16 >> //Peter
17 >
18 > Please,... just look at the Changelog!
19 >
20 > quote, first added to the tree: *vixie-cron-4.1 (27 Aug 2004)
21 >
22 > and it has been patched ever since, picking up patches from other
23 > distros, etc., fixing bugs,...
24 >
25 > Currently at revision 14.
26 >
27 > Plus I don't recall that it be tree-cleaned in this thread, just to
28 > change the default in the install manual to one that is being developed.
29 >
30
31 Can we please stop this derailed part of this thread? Please do not let
32 Peter render another thread useless.
33
34 --
35 Regards,
36 Markos Chandras

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>