1 |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:51:13PM +1000, Troy Dack wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:09:17AM -0400, Paul wrote: |
6 |
> >> Hi; |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >> A long while back, I asked if it was a requirement |
9 |
> >> for ebuild submiters to assign copyright. I was told |
10 |
> >> no, GPL license was entirely sufficient. I think this has |
11 |
> >> changed, or was untrue. |
12 |
> >> Now, Ive already given up on the submission |
13 |
> >> process, but I _am_ curious about this policy, as I |
14 |
> >> havent yet given up on Gentoo itself. |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> Paul |
17 |
> >> set@×××××.com |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I would be very interested in hearing your issues with ebuild |
20 |
> > submission, if you'd like to contact me privately about it. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > With regards to copyrights, it's necessary for us to own copyright on |
23 |
> > ebuilds in order to defend our intellectual property. If we (Gentoo |
24 |
> > Technologies) don't own copyright on ebuilds (and other pieces of |
25 |
> > Gentoo), we have no legal leg to stand on if someone (for example) |
26 |
> > attempts to put a more restrictive license on that piece of intellectual |
27 |
> > property. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > In short: if we don't own copyright, we can't defend ourselves. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> [Note I am not versed in the many nuances of copyright law] |
32 |
> |
33 |
> I can understand this position, however I think some people feel that this |
34 |
> is in some way removing or diminishing the fact that they have made a |
35 |
> contribution to Gentoo. |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
Why? Attribution is given in ChangeLogs as per policy. |
39 |
|
40 |
> Would it not be possible for copyright to be assigned to Gentoo and the |
41 |
> author of the ebuild? |
42 |
|
43 |
That's what we needed information from Daniel's lawyer about. |
44 |
|
45 |
> |
46 |
> I believe that this has been discussed previously on this list (when I get |
47 |
> a chance I'll search my archive) and that there was an agreement reached |
48 |
> between Gentoo and an educational institution on this very matter. |
49 |
> |
50 |
|
51 |
Was that agreement actually reached? I have been away from development |
52 |
and not very involved for a couple weeks. |
53 |
|
54 |
CC'ing Daniel for more information. |
55 |
|
56 |
-- |
57 |
Jon Portnoy |
58 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
59 |
|
60 |
-- |
61 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |