| 1 |
On 26 February 2013 16:37, Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 11:44:31 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > I see a *HUGE* reason. glibc ships with ptmalloc. If you think they |
| 7 |
> > > should use jemalloc, talk to them. Don't just do it in Gentoo. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Certainly I think it would be far more productive to talk to the glibc |
| 10 |
> > maintainers first. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You mean productive like below? ;) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11261 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ulrich Drepper: |
| 17 |
> "Stop reopening. There is a solution for people who are stupid enough to |
| 18 |
> create too many threads. No implementation will be perfect for everyone. |
| 19 |
> The |
| 20 |
> glibc implementation is tuned for reasonable programs and will run much |
| 21 |
> faster |
| 22 |
> than any other I tested." |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Merge of jemalloc upstream is likely never going to happen. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> regards |
| 27 |
> MM |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
It could happen. Ulrich Drepper is no longer in charge of Glibc and he's |
| 32 |
barely involved in the development at all recently from what i've |
| 33 |
heard/seen. |
Archives