1 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0500, Chandler Carruth wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>It occurs to me that this could be (to an extent) accomplished by having |
7 |
>>a few more "specialized" subprofiles for x86: base, desktop, gnome, and kde. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>base - as the name implies, a _basic_ starting point... very similar to |
10 |
>>server profiles, etc. veeery minimal. |
11 |
>>desktop - almost identical to the current USE flags -- what Joe Q. User |
12 |
>>"should" have to be safe, and have programs function as expected. |
13 |
>>gnome / kde - slight specializations of the above to tailor the use |
14 |
>>flags for one desktop environ or the other.. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>>Problems? |
17 |
>>1) heavier usage and depth of the profile, making where things come in |
18 |
>>more and more obscure. |
19 |
>>2) could lead to proliferation of environment tailored "desktop" |
20 |
>>derivatives. (xfce, fluxbox, the list could go on) This may not be a |
21 |
>>problem as many distros have successfully divided between KDE and Gnome, |
22 |
>>and the base / desktop profiles would allow users ways to customize, as |
23 |
>>always. |
24 |
>>3) there is _no_ functionality added by any of this, only |
25 |
>>"user-friendliness" after a fashion, and as such, perhaps it should all |
26 |
>>be chucked in favor of having users competently declare their own global |
27 |
>>USE flags during the install, however I doubt that'll get very far. *shrug* |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> |
30 |
> |
31 |
>4) need for the ability to inherit multiple parent profiles. |
32 |
> |
33 |
>Otherwise, x86 desktop profile is not guranteed in anyway to reflect |
34 |
>sparc desktop profile (yes, somewhat the case now). |
35 |
> |
36 |
>A gnome desktop profile would make sense imo, but from a work |
37 |
>standpoint is totally dependant on ability to inherit multiple |
38 |
>parents. |
39 |
> |
40 |
>~harring |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
How close is that ability to portage? Is there interest/room for |
44 |
help/work towards it? I would like to see a more sensible approach to |
45 |
establishing default settings (USE flags not the only thing here). Would |
46 |
help the confusion, and end some of the arts/no-arts, eds/no-eds madness. |
47 |
|
48 |
Would also aid end users in beginning to customize their system rather |
49 |
than simply using a default setup. |
50 |
|
51 |
What about the other 3 problems I myself raised? |
52 |
|
53 |
-Chandler Carruth |
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |