1 |
On 04/01/2014 01:54 AM, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
2 |
>> >Also, I don't see that it should be an issue, but do you think this |
3 |
>> >might affect catalyst runs --- I have to ask because |
4 |
>> >repairing/reconfiguring seeds is a lot of work. |
5 |
> Well, I think this mostly depends on whether you want multiple multilib |
6 |
> ABIs in stages -- or if you assume that the toolchain is enough, |
7 |
> and people will build other ABIs as they need. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Though I think that once toolchain switches to abi_* flags (vapier |
10 |
> seems to show interest in that), we will use.force the necessary ABIs |
11 |
> on it and its dependencies, so there should be no explicit need for |
12 |
> change. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> However, I guess the toolchain changes will be sent out for testing |
15 |
> anyway, so releng can check first hand. |
16 |
I have taken a non-standard approach to the hardened/linux/uclibc |
17 |
profiles where I do no inherit from arch. There was too much cruft in |
18 |
arch, so I just mirror the relevant stuff including the abi flag stuff. |
19 |
I understand my approach has pros/cons ... but give out the should when |
20 |
the change is being tested and I'll see if I'm about to have any |
21 |
breakage. I currently seed at least 12 different |
22 |
arches/isa/abi/hard-soft float combinations which would be a pita to fix |
23 |
manually on native (read slow) hardware. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
28 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
29 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
30 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |