| 1 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> ATs can inform you whether something works in the comment to an |
| 3 |
> attachment, which, unlike the attachment, will end up in my mailbox. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Ok, so i sample my emerge --info > myconfig.txt and attach that. This is ok |
| 6 |
with me. However, i propose that this functionality is included into pybugz, |
| 7 |
which already offers inlining emerge --info. That would speed up the process |
| 8 |
tremendously (thanks liquidx!). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> One solution might be to open your own AT bug, make the stabilisation |
| 11 |
> bug depend on it, and use the AT bug to have ATs post their `emerge |
| 12 |
> info`. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I disagree. That adds complexity and thus increases time spent on bugzi w/o |
| 15 |
actual benefit for the overall dev-community. I'd rather go w/ posting emerge |
| 16 |
--info as a attachment. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
MfG, Matti Bickel |
| 19 |
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de |
| 20 |
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred |
Archives