| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 2 |
<dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> so... is this something where I should suddenly in a moment of clarity shout |
| 4 |
> "ah, that cld workaround" ?! |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Samstag 20 August 2011 20:03:04 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 7 |
>> we added the cld workaround to gcc-4.3.0+ in early 2008 until packages |
| 8 |
>> sorted themselves out. i think they have at this point. in terms of |
| 9 |
>> kernels, we're talking about ones around 2.6.25 and earlier. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> i'll be dropping it from our gcc builds, so now is the time to make noise |
| 12 |
>> if this affects you. |
| 13 |
>> -mike |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379367 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
... and, don't top post. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Matt |
Archives