Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:08:53
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch by William Hubbs
On Friday 12 March 2010 23:47:05 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty <betelgeuse@g.o> > > > > wrote: > > > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording > > > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in > > > question but there's a difference of opinion here: > > > > > > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: > > > > > > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch > > > team is the one in charge. > > > > The "problem" with assigning bugs to arch teams is when the user comments > > on the bug after it is resolved. If the arch team is CC'd, they remove > > themselves when done and any comments after the bug is closed goes to > > someone that is interested. If the arch team is assigned, then the > > comment basically goes to /dev/null. So, if we are to improve the user > > experience, assign to maintainer and CC arch team. > > This is a good enough reason for me to vote for assigning bugs to > maintainers and cc'ing arch teams. This is the way I was taught that > this should be handled, and this comment explains why. > > Since all the arch team does is stabilize or keyword, the maintainer > needs to know if other issues come up with the bug after it is closed. > > William
I like that idea as well -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: