Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:53:26
Message-Id: 20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when a user
3 > files a report at bugs.gentoo.org
4
5 I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to figure out
6 which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA team member's opinion
7 (personal attacks, whatever) should be an important input but not the final say.
8
9 --
10 Renat Lumpau all things web-apps
11 C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA
12 America - land of the free*
13 *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>