Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Schlemmer <azarah@×××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound | ||
| Date: | Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:30:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1001262589.18410.2.camel@nosferatu.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound by Mikael Hallendal |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 2001-09-23 at 17:14, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Hmm .. I built it with esound-support yesterday (esound 0.2.22-r2). |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > No problems at all. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than |
| 8 | > 0.2.5? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | dont i just feel stupid now ? thought the porblem was that 0.2.8 was |
| 11 | newer than 0.2.22 and spend too much time to try and fix. just show you |
| 12 | that it cant hurt to verify stuff ;p |
| 13 | |
| 14 | MS |