| 1 |
On 09:37 Wed 03 Oct , Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Trying to include things that aren't implemented or things that are |
| 3 |
> controversial will delay it. It's difficult to make time estimates |
| 4 |
> for anything that's not implemented yet. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It's trivial to do the EAPI-1 bump if we only include things that |
| 7 |
> are already implemented. I can have a sys-apps/portage release in |
| 8 |
> the tree this week with EAPI-1 support if we choose to do that. |
| 9 |
> Looking at bug #174380, I'd say that EAPI-1 should certainly include |
| 10 |
> #174405, #174410, and #179380 since they're all implemented and |
| 11 |
> relatively non-controversial. Anything more than those can lead to |
| 12 |
> potential delays. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Alright, do it! =) "Release early, release often" applies to EAPI too. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
Donnie |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives