| 1 |
On Thursday 18 May 2006 15:06, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It has not been. As far as I know such a requirement does not exist. |
| 4 |
> > In |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It does. The reason for it is pretty good, as kloeri mentioned: The API |
| 7 |
> of an eclass may never change. See GLEP 33 for some horror scenarios |
| 8 |
> [1] ;) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Unfortunately this GLEP has not been implemented yet. This eclass would |
| 11 |
indeed be an ideal elib. Also, for this eclass the API requirements are |
| 12 |
not as strict as it is only intended to be used in unpack and compile |
| 13 |
stages. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Paul |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 19 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 20 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 21 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives