| 1 |
On Sunday 02 April 2006 15:12, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 02 April 2006 20:41, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > nothing personal, but who are you to say whether it's legit ? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> It's really not a question what's legit (heck, you started using this term, |
| 6 |
> so blaming Olivier for using it is a bit odd) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
i didnt blame Olivier for anything ... doesnt anyone get the "nothing |
| 9 |
personal" part ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> but what we (can and want to) support. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
i dont recall asking you to support my packages |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Wouldn't it have been time for you to speak up, when the Gnome |
| 16 |
> herd announced to deprecate Gtk1 support for applications that build again |
| 17 |
> Gtk2!? Instead playing the road block for the very few people who may still |
| 18 |
> favor Gtk1, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
last time i recall following the gtk/gtk2 stuff, the idea was that in the |
| 21 |
future to move to a gtk/gtk1 situation ... but this was back when Spider was |
| 22 |
The Man, so i guess people forgot about that |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> it should be more the question, if there's anyone supporting |
| 25 |
> Gtk1 upstream with regards to security issues etc.. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
and when such a situation arises, the solution may to simply drop the optional |
| 28 |
support. such a situation has not arose, so using such hypothetical examples |
| 29 |
is meaningless. |
| 30 |
-mike |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives