Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Justin Lecher <jlec@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:10:11
Message-Id: 20151111100944.77313cc6.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:53:03 -0500
2 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 31 Oct 2015 09:08, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 03:06:21 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
6 > > > On 30 Oct 2015 18:20, Michał Górny wrote:
7 > > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:03:59 +0000 (UTC) "Justin Lecher" wrote:
8 > > > > > --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
9 > > > > > +++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
10 > > > > > @@ -322,8 +322,7 @@ distutils-r1_python_prepare_all() {
11 > > > > >
12 > > > > > _distutils-r1_disable_ez_setup
13 > > > > >
14 > > > > > - if [[ ${DISTUTILS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD} && ! ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]
15 > > > > > - then
16 > > > > > + if [[ ${DISTUTILS_IN_SOURCE_BUILD} && ! ${DISTUTILS_SINGLE_IMPL} ]]; then
17 > > > >
18 > > > > This was intentionally wrapped to stay within 72-column line width. Not
19 > > > > saying the eclass is perfect in keeping text width, especially with
20 > > > > others committing random changes to it, but that's no reason to
21 > > > > introduce further offenders.
22 > > >
23 > > > Gentoo has never had a hard 80-col rule let alone 72-cols. forcing a wrap
24 > > > here makes no sense and the new version is an improvement.
25 > >
26 > > For years, Gentoo was unable to make *any* *sane* *global* rules. Which
27 > > doesn't mean everything needs to be as crappy as the overall Gentoo
28 > > 'quality'.
29 >
30 > you forgot "imo". we've had commonly accepted standards that people generally
31 > kept to, some of which were more fuzzy than others. but we've never had a hard
32 > 80 col rule and claiming that 72 col is an improvement is pretty hard to
33 > swallow. there's no reasonable argument for such minimal restrictions in
34 > todays's world, and "it's always been that way" doesn't fly.
35
36 How about this; my terminal barely fits 90 characters? Of course,
37 I could then just shot arbitrarily at 90 but for 10 characters... I'd
38 rather use the old standard 80. Minus 8 characters for friendly e-mail
39 quoting, which is also kinda 'old standard'.
40
41 --
42 Best regards,
43 Michał Górny
44 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies