| 1 |
On 18-07-04 12:54:50, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu śro, 04.07.2018 o godzinie 12∶35 +0200, użytkownik Kristian |
| 3 |
> Fiskerstrand napisał: |
| 4 |
> > On 07/04/2018 12:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > -2. Root key and signing subkey of EITHER: |
| 6 |
> > > +2. Root key and a dedicated signing subkey, both of EITHER: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > "dedicated" here might be misread to be gentoo-specific, which doesn't |
| 9 |
> > really make much sense. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What alternative do you suggest? We really want to make clear that we |
| 12 |
> require a separate subkey, and that subkey is not marked for encryption. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'd suggest something along the lines of 'subkey with signing only |
| 16 |
capabilitiyies' or 'signing only subkey'. I state this because you are |
| 17 |
able to have a combined SE subkey which would match the language of |
| 18 |
dedicated or simply only saying 'signing subkey'. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives