Archives
Archives
| From: | Jason Zaman <perfinion@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, licenses <licenses@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 2019 01:42:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20190924014220.GA45747@baraddur.perfinion.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having |
| 5 | > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's |
| 6 | > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Yes there is: |
| 11 | https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html |
| 12 | https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-or-later.html |
| 13 | |
| 14 | The "GPL-2.0" one is deprecated: |
| 15 | https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html |
| 16 | |
| 17 | If SPDX moved to having two names "-only" and "-or-later" then we should |
| 18 | too. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -- Jason |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |