| 1 |
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 09:46 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> atm we have qa checks in: |
| 5 |
> - ${PORTDIR}/metadata/install-qa-check.d |
| 6 |
> - /usr/lib/portage/pythonX.Y/install-qa-check.d (installed via portage) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Many of them do not begin as "Qa Notice" so it is very hard track them without |
| 9 |
> naked eye especially via tinderbox. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> There is a bug where I reported part of: |
| 12 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/728046 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> are there any contrary opinions in adding "Qa Notice" at the begin of each |
| 15 |
> check? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I suppose that makes sense, and we should probably also check eqawarns |
| 18 |
used in eclasses for that. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That said, it might be more consistent to change Portage behavior to use |
| 21 |
some visible distinction between output types (not just color), e.g. |
| 22 |
have it output: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
* [QA] ... |
| 25 |
* [WA] ... |
| 26 |
* [ER] ... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives