| 1 |
On 11/4/20 11:12 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Is there value in making snapshots of app-portage/no-distcc-env? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I don't really think so, and that's why I didn't do it. Should I reconsider? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
We havy many similar packages keyworded, like all theme packages. Last |
| 8 |
upstream commit was made 1 year ago, couldn't you treat it as a release |
| 9 |
at that point? Does it make sense to have a live ebuild for stagnated |
| 10 |
upstream? 1 year is enough time to get even ~alpha keyworded, although |
| 11 |
in this case ALLARCHES would apply. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On a more principal level I do wonder why this is an ebuild at all, |
| 14 |
should we all package our /etc/portage configs? But as a distcc user I |
| 15 |
could find this useful, and with keywords and 'optfeature' added to |
| 16 |
distcc, you could find more users reporting more packages to be added |
| 17 |
upstream. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- juippis |
Archives