| 1 |
On Tuesday 25 December 2001 03:12, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> mån 2001-12-24 klockan 09.27 skrev Geert Bevin: |
| 3 |
> > Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Personally I'm not so hot either that these ebuilds would propagate to |
| 6 |
> > every regular user. However, using cvs for developers to make it easy to |
| 7 |
> > test the ebuilds is of course the best way to do so. Why not put them in |
| 8 |
> > gentoo-src in a dedicated ebuild-beta directory. That way, the best of |
| 9 |
> > both world are met. Another idea might be for rsync to filter out all |
| 10 |
> > masked ebuilds. However I don't know if this would be possible. Starting |
| 11 |
> > to branch the cvs into stable / development ebuilds seems a bit too much |
| 12 |
> > of a hassle currently. After the release of 1.0 this might however be |
| 13 |
> > the best way to proceed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This can be solved with CVS branches in gentoo-x86, using branches as |
| 16 |
> stable/unstable whatever, and let rsync (and anonymous cvs) only export |
| 17 |
> stable. |
| 18 |
Well, I'd be glad to have cvs branches. It would certainly be the most |
| 19 |
comfortable solution. However as I see it it would probably need portage-side |
| 20 |
suport of at least multiple portage dirs. drobbins? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dan Armak |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
| 26 |
Matan, Israel |
Archives