| 1 |
* Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
<snip> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Non gcc compilers have never been supported and probably never will be. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If someone decides to work on that topic, IMHO the best approach |
| 8 |
would be providing an gcc-style frontend, so we actually get |
| 9 |
an drop-in-replacement (at least from the command line view). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I've done something similar w/ my universal toolchain project, |
| 12 |
which works compiler-independent (although I currently have only |
| 13 |
an gcc backend ;-o) and also provides an drop-in-replacement for |
| 14 |
libtool w/ gcc as an additional frontend. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/Universal_Toolchain |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
cu |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 21 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 22 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 23 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 24 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 25 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 26 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 27 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives