Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in June 2004

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] new developer: swegener Sven Wegener Tue, 22 Jun 2004 05:19:39
[gentoo-dev] Re: From [gentoo-portage-dev] some problems about inn ebuild Sven Wegener Tue, 22 Jun 2004 04:45:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Screenshot Contest! Josh Glover Tue, 22 Jun 2004 01:01:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Ciaran McCreesh Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:39:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:21:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:12:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Ciaran McCreesh Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:50:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:04:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Chris W Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:50:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance on undocumented behaviour [WAS: Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer] Travis Tilley Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:47:28
[gentoo-dev] stage3 tarball inside a livecd-stage2 iso? ebrewer@×××××××××.com Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:36:11
[gentoo-dev] Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:35:24 -0600 Agriffis Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:42:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance on undocumented behaviour [WAS: Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer] Jason Stubbs Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:15:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] new developer: swegener Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:55:58
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox) seanecovel Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:55:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance on undocumented behaviour [WAS: Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer] Daniel Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:30:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance on undocumented behaviour [WAS: Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer] Jason Stubbs Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:05:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Chris W Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:13:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Stuart Herbert Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:39:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Stuart Herbert Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:38:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Screenshot Contest! ian@×××××××××××××.org Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:40:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Daniel Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:03:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Screenshot Contest! Jochen Maes Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:52:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jason Wever Mon, 21 Jun 2004 04:21:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Travis Tilley Mon, 21 Jun 2004 03:33:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Travis Tilley Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:53:01
[gentoo-dev] new developer: swegener Aron Griffis Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:25:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] preliminary xml interface to package.g.o Andrew Ross Mon, 21 Jun 2004 01:43:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Chris W Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:06:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] preliminary xml interface to package.g.o Daniel Hurt Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:34:00
[gentoo-dev] preliminary xml interface to package.g.o marduk Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:14:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jon Hood Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:34:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Guy Martin Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:20:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jon Hood Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:06:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Screenshot Contest! Susie Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:04:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Stuart Herbert Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:20:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] Profiles? Jason Stubbs Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:15:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:36:13
[gentoo-dev] Profiles? Charles Marcus Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:34:05
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Screenshot Contest! Tim Yamin Sun, 20 Jun 2004 09:10:12
[gentoo-dev] Webapp Version of ht://dig Chris W Sun, 20 Jun 2004 09:04:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jason Wever Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:17:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:59:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jason Wever Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:33:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Donnie Berkholz Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:25:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:04:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Donnie Berkholz Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:34:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:32:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:13:17
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] From [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:49:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Danny van Dyk Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:44:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Stephen P. Becker Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:36:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sat, 19 Jun 2004 16:31:46
Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals - required? Jason Stubbs Sat, 19 Jun 2004 16:20:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals - required? Jason Stubbs Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:50:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:21:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals - required? Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:06:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals - required? joe@××××××××××.net Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:00:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ARM Development Box Chuck Short Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:52:54
[gentoo-dev] kernel devs Deedra Waters Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:50:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ARM Development Box Chuck Short Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:20:14
[gentoo-dev] Virtuals - required? Jason Stubbs Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:54:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] automate "make install" stuff Paul de Vrieze Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:31:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Sami Samhuri Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:08:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Brett I. Holcomb Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:44:43
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:26:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Brett I. Holcomb Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:21:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Brett I. Holcomb Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:21:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Carsten Lohrke Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:36:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Mike Frysinger Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:35:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Robin H. Johnson Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:27:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Carsten Lohrke Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:20:07
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo ARM Development Box Mike Frysinger Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:16:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Travis Tilley Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:05:57
[gentoo-dev] Re: Automatic ebuild stabilization Duncan Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:00:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Donnie Berkholz Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:58:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Ciaran McCreesh Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:35:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Donnie Berkholz Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:29:13
[gentoo-dev] What category does a backup program go in? Brett I. Holcomb Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:35:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Carsten Lohrke Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:28:47
[gentoo-dev] Automatic ebuild stabilization Joel Konkle-Parker Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:22:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:31:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Donnie Berkholz Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:27:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Paul de Vrieze Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:19:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Info + Status Update Nicholas Jones Fri, 18 Jun 2004 19:44:10
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Ciaran McCreesh Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:47:56
[gentoo-dev] Announcing the net-news herd Sven Wegener Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:12:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer foser Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:04:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] "RFC": Automated Gentoo Barry Shaw Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:38:18
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Info + Status Update Jason Rhinelander Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:03:38
[gentoo-dev] Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer Jon Portnoy Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:54:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Info + Status Update Nicholas Jones Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:08:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Info + Status Update Nicholas Jones Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:57:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Info + Status Update Nicholas Jones Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:18:25
[gentoo-dev] emerge sync: ls-lR ? sf Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:55:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Herd: net-news Seemant Kulleen Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:37:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: System Recovery - New Core Functionality request... Chris Gianelloni Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:21:52
[gentoo-dev] Re: System Recovery - New Core Functionality request... Charles Marcus Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:59:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] "RFC": Automated Gentoo Christopher Korn Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:49:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] "RFC": Automated Gentoo Christopher Korn Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:45:20