Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:36:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Berkeley DB, coexistence of different versions |
Robin H. Johnson |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:25:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:15:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:06:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:03:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:51:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:43:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Berkeley DB, coexistence of different versions |
Georgi Georgiev |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:37:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Nathan L. Adams |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:43:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Stephen P. Becker |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:31:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Summary] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:24:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:22:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Daniel Gryniewicz |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:21:32 |
[gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:21:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Daniel Gryniewicz |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:20:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:19:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Nathan L. Adams |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:18:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:17:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:57:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Jason Stubbs |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:51:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Martin Schlemmer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:20:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Daniel Drake |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:11:51 |
[gentoo-dev] Berkeley DB, coexistence of different versions |
Stefaan |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:53:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Chris White |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:40:10 |
[gentoo-dev] [Summary] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Chris White |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:30:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:16:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Grant Goodyear |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:05:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Joseph Jezak |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:50:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:34:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:26:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:25:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:22:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Olivier Crete |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:17:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Martin Schlemmer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:15:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:13:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Wernfried Haas |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:09:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Simon Stelling |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:08:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:03:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:01:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Grant Goodyear |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:58:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Aron Griffis |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:53:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:52:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Homer Parker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:49:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Simon Stelling |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:42:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Thierry Carrez |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:42:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:36:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Simon Stelling |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:21:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Donnie Berkholz |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:18:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:16:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Martin Schlemmer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:14:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] subscribe |
Curtis Napier |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:08:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:01:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:59:42 |
[gentoo-dev] GLEP 41: Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff |
Simon Stelling |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:46:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/lzo-2 help |
Luca Barbato |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:38:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Grant Goodyear |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:35:25 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Dan Meltzer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:32:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:27:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Donnie Berkholz |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:24:35 |
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC |
Thierry Carrez |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:09:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:57:10 |
Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Encoding could not be reliably detected. Contents not available. |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:00:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Chris Gianelloni |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:55:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:42:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:35:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:27:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Summary] tentative x86 arch team glep |
Michael Kohl |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:24:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQs for maintainer-wanted ebuilds |
Jan Kundrát |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:23:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Jan Kundrát |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:16:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Summary] tentative x86 arch team glep |
Ed W |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:10:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:07:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Peter Hyman |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:03:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQs for maintainer-wanted ebuilds |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:00:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQs for maintainer-wanted ebuilds |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:59:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Martin Schlemmer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:14:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Martin Schlemmer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:08:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Peter Hyman |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:45:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:41:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Maurice van der Pot |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:31:54 |
Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Encoding could not be reliably detected. Contents not available. |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:29:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Chris Gianelloni |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:07:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage log suggestion |
Frank Schafer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:39:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage log suggestion |
Thomas de Grenier de Latour |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:32:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage log suggestion |
Brian Harring |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:06:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Stephen P. Becker |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:05:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugs in autoconf/automake and python-fchksum |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:02:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:00:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugs in autoconf/automake and python-fchksum |
Frank Schafer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:54:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Frank Schafer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:53:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugs in autoconf/automake and python-fchksum |
Henrik Brix Andersen |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:51:05 |
[gentoo-dev] Bugs in autoconf/automake and python-fchksum |
Frank Schafer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:47:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:46:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Martin Schlemmer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:44:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:43:17 |
[gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? |
Frank Schafer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:30:05 |
[gentoo-dev] Portage log suggestion |
Frank Schafer |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:18:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQs for maintainer-wanted ebuilds |
Ivan Yosifov |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:08:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:58:27 |