Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:22:42 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Sven Köhler |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:18:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Encoding could not be reliably detected. Contents not available. |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:37:09 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Sven Köhler |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:14:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Alin Nastac |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:30:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Patrick Lauer |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:20:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Stefan Schweizer |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:12:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Duncan Coutts |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:38:55 |
[gentoo-dev] who renamed adsl-start to pppoe-start and why |
Jürgen Schinker |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:30:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Fernando J. Pereda |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:27:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Stuart Herbert |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:21:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder |
Kalin KOZHUHAROV |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:01:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Aron Griffis |
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:58:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] up for removal timeframe |
foser |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:09:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:14:21 |
[gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder |
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:13:04 |
[gentoo-dev] List downtime today at 1700 UTC |
Kurt Lieber |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:23:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Stuart Herbert |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:44:20 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-misc/trickle |
Mark Loeser |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:46:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi |
Mark Loeser |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:59:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Dan Armak |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:12:30 |
[gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi |
foser |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:08:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Where are the x86/i686 2006.0 packages? |
Andrew Gaffney |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:25:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Where are the x86/i686 2006.0 packages? |
Nick Rout |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Sandboxes |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:36:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Where are the x86/i686 2006.0 packages? |
Andrew Gaffney |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:08:11 |
[gentoo-dev] Where are the x86/i686 2006.0 packages? |
Nick Rout |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:40:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Sandboxes |
Lars Strojny |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:33:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Patrick McLean |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:32:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Encoding could not be reliably detected. Contents not available. |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:55:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:27:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing broken libtool/autotools handling |
Mike Frysinger |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:55:39 |
[gentoo-dev] Fixing broken libtool/autotools handling |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:06:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Aron Griffis |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:07:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
foser |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:29:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:59:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Dan Armak |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:26:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Sandboxes |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:20:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] questionable usefulness of virtual/pdfviewer,psviewer |
Stefan Schweizer |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:46:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/ocaml - to be or not to be |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:33:56 |
[gentoo-dev] questionable usefulness of virtual/pdfviewer,psviewer |
Carsten Lohrke |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:42:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Donnie Berkholz |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:27:59 |
[gentoo-dev] virtual/ocaml - to be or not to be |
Ingo Bormuth |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:32:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:03:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
foser |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:57:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Chris Gianelloni |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:24:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots |
Simon Strandman |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:11:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:07:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots |
Simon Strandman |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:58:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Chris Bainbridge |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:54:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Paul de Vrieze |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:33:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for tester of sys-apps/pcmciautils on AMD64 |
Henrik Brix Andersen |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:41:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Ryan Phillips |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:47:06 |
[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords |
Daniel Ahlberg |
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:43:36 |
[gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification |
Dan Armak |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:04:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Greg KH |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:33:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Looking for tester of sys-apps/pcmciautils on AMD64 |
Henrik Brix Andersen |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:56:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd |
Henrik Brix Andersen |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:15:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Fernando J. Pereda |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:00:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Fernando J. Pereda |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:57:28 |
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo wants YOU! (for GNUstep) |
Grobian |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:45:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Luca Barbato |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:43:18 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots |
R Hill |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:23:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Duncan Coutts |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:33:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Aron Griffis |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:02:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:35:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Fernando J. Pereda |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:25:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Fernando J. Pereda |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:24:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Aron Griffis |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:15:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Aron Griffis |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:06:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Aron Griffis |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:03:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Stephen P. Becker |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:21:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Official overlay support |
Paul de Vrieze |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:03:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support |
Michael Cummings |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:27:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] vim 7 beta |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:03:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:39:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:49:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support |
Paul de Vrieze |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:46:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support |
Paul de Vrieze |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:39:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:53:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] vim 7 beta |
Edward Catmur |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:05:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:11:26 |
[gentoo-dev] vim 7 beta |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:32:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:22:36 |
[gentoo-dev] toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots |
Simon Strandman |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 13:15:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Duncan Coutts |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:42:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:26:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: overlay support current proposal? |
Duncan |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:01:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:57:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:55:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Duncan Coutts |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:51:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Duncan Coutts |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:44:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:38:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:21:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Ryan Phillips |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 06:50:17 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Official overlay support |
Duncan |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:57:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:36:07 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Sandboxes |
Duncan |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:33:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? |
Alec Warner |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:36:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open |
Daniel Drake |
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:01:15 |