| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev" |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 31 May 2008 21:19:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS |
Mike Auty |
Sat, 31 May 2008 19:32:50 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sat, 31 May 2008 19:24:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Tobias Klausmann |
Sat, 31 May 2008 18:28:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Sat, 31 May 2008 18:16:41 |
| [gentoo-dev] profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev" |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 31 May 2008 18:01:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 31 May 2008 17:47:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
ben tucker |
Sat, 31 May 2008 17:31:59 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: packages up for grabs |
Ali Polatel |
Sat, 31 May 2008 17:05:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Thilo Bangert |
Sat, 31 May 2008 16:55:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:43 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: packages up for grabs |
Ali Polatel |
Sat, 31 May 2008 15:34:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Philip Webb |
Sat, 31 May 2008 14:35:03 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Duncan |
Sat, 31 May 2008 13:19:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Marius Mauch |
Sat, 31 May 2008 11:49:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Alexis Ballier |
Sat, 31 May 2008 11:41:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Alec Warner |
Sat, 31 May 2008 11:26:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 31 May 2008 10:38:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
David Leverton |
Sat, 31 May 2008 10:27:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 31 May 2008 10:17:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: packages up for grabs |
Tiziano Müller |
Sat, 31 May 2008 09:14:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Raúl Porcel |
Sat, 31 May 2008 09:06:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sat, 31 May 2008 08:05:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Tobias Scherbaum |
Sat, 31 May 2008 07:48:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Peter Volkov |
Sat, 31 May 2008 06:35:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Roy Marples |
Sat, 31 May 2008 06:22:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Michal Kurgan |
Sat, 31 May 2008 06:09:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs |
Mike Frysinger |
Sat, 31 May 2008 05:09:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:28:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:15:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:03:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 03:03:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:58:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ravi Pinjala |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:50:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:33:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:23:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:14:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:08:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:08:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 31 May 2008 02:01:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:50:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:44:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Josh Saddler |
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:39:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:17:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 31 May 2008 01:06:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Marius Mauch |
Sat, 31 May 2008 00:34:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 00:30:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 31 May 2008 00:20:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 31 May 2008 00:03:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:57:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:50:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:43:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:26:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:21:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:17:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:16:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 30 May 2008 23:11:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 22:14:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Donnie Berkholz |
Fri, 30 May 2008 22:07:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 21:54:01 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) |
Mart Raudsepp |
Fri, 30 May 2008 21:48:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 21:37:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Mart Raudsepp |
Fri, 30 May 2008 21:32:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 19:48:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 30 May 2008 19:32:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 19:20:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 30 May 2008 19:16:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] VCS repository overview for Gentoo |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 30 May 2008 17:34:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
David Leverton |
Fri, 30 May 2008 16:43:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 16:35:14 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) |
Fri, 30 May 2008 16:30:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
David Leverton |
Fri, 30 May 2008 15:58:01 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) |
Fri, 30 May 2008 12:40:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Rémi Cardona |
Fri, 30 May 2008 12:31:52 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) |
Fri, 30 May 2008 12:22:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Santiago M. Mola |
Fri, 30 May 2008 12:09:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) |
Fri, 30 May 2008 11:38:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 30 May 2008 10:55:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Mike Auty |
Fri, 30 May 2008 07:16:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Peter Volkov |
Fri, 30 May 2008 06:58:59 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask |
Peter Volkov |
Fri, 30 May 2008 05:37:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Marius Mauch |
Fri, 30 May 2008 05:25:18 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split |
Ali Polatel |
Thu, 29 May 2008 19:01:37 |
| [gentoo-dev] Recent changes wrt python.eclass |
Ali Polatel |
Thu, 29 May 2008 18:57:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Marius Mauch |
Thu, 29 May 2008 17:34:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Thu, 29 May 2008 14:51:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Thu, 29 May 2008 14:50:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) |
Thu, 29 May 2008 09:03:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Mike Auty |
Thu, 29 May 2008 08:28:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Fabian Groffen |
Thu, 29 May 2008 07:56:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Rémi Cardona |
Thu, 29 May 2008 06:54:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Donnie Berkholz |
Thu, 29 May 2008 05:14:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Ryan Hill |
Thu, 29 May 2008 04:49:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? |
Marius Mauch |
Wed, 28 May 2008 23:17:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Thomas Anderson |
Wed, 28 May 2008 11:24:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Krzysiek Pawlik |
Wed, 28 May 2008 07:03:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 26 May 2008 19:01:14 |
| [gentoo-dev] A unit-testing prototype |
Donnie Berkholz |
Mon, 26 May 2008 09:47:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split |
Bo Ørsted Andresen |
Mon, 26 May 2008 09:28:22 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-05-25 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 26 May 2008 00:15:07 |
Archives