| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] X11 on Lemote Fulong (Loongson 2E) -- 'lm2e' local USE flag RFC |
Donnie Berkholz |
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:50:50 |
| [gentoo-dev] X11 on Lemote Fulong (Loongson 2E) -- 'lm2e' local USE flag RFC |
Stuart Longland |
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:25:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:56:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Jim Ramsay |
Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:24:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:48:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:48:23 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:07:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:39:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Arun Raghavan |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:31:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:24:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:20:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Marius Mauch |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:10:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:52:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Panagiotis Christopoulos |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:29:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:14:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Arun Raghavan |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:08:57 |
| [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:50:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Mart Raudsepp |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:18:13 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-07-27 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:15:06 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:41:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Marius Mauch |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:49:44 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:43:22 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:24:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Jeremy Olexa |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:50:51 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:58:25 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:41:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:24:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:12:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:11:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:06:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:04:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:01:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:54:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:43:59 |
| [gentoo-dev] split Qt 4.4 dependencies |
Carsten Lohrke |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:16:34 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:57:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:41:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:35:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:07:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:00:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:56:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:40:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:06:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Olivier Galibert |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:17:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Luca Barbato |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:14:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Christian Birchinger |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:03:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Mart Raudsepp |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:56:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:46:08 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:40:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Duncan |
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:15:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:54:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:08:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:07:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:03:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should 'imlib' USE flag be on by default in x86 and amd64 desktop profiles? |
Olivier Crête |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:27:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should 'imlib' USE flag be on by default in x86 and amd64 desktop profiles? |
Petteri Räty |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:24:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should 'imlib' USE flag be on by default in x86 and amd64 desktop profiles? |
Jim Ramsay |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:00:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Rémi Cardona |
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:26:56 |
| [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted |
Christian Birchinger |
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:59:55 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:40:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for July 24 |
Alec Warner |
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:46:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for July 24 |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:07:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for July 24 |
Donnie Berkholz |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:26:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for July 24 |
Donnie Berkholz |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:13:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] system set no longer in part of world set |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:36:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] system set no longer in part of world set |
Marius Mauch |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:18:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Paul Varner |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:34:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] system set no longer in part of world set |
Doug Goldstein |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:03:00 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnustep-apps/helpviewer, gnustep-apps/mylibrary |
Bernard Cafarelli |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:57:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs |
Christian Faulhammer |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:27:35 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs |
Christian Faulhammer |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:27:06 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-07-20 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:15:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-nds/openldap: openldap-2.4.7.ebuild openldap-2.4.10.ebuild openldap-2.3.41.ebuild |
Peter Alfredsen |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:42:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:30:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Thomas Anderson |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:06:36 |
| [gentoo-dev] call for maintainer |
William Hubbs |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:35:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies |
Joe Peterson |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:25:47 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-nds/openldap: openldap-2.4.7.ebuild openldap-2.4.10.ebuild openldap-2.3.41.ebuild |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:19:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Alexis Ballier |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:01:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies |
Marius Mauch |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:31:18 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 |
Patrick Börjesson |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:09:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:57:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies |
Peter Volkov |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:52:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 |
Peter Volkov |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:49:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Duncan |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:00:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Installation of static libraries, USE=static-libs proposal |
Peter Volkov |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:44:55 |
| [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs |
Christian Faulhammer |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:44:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Donnie Berkholz |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:56:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Ben de Groot |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:48:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Jeremy Olexa |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:43:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Josh Saddler |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:34:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Ferris McCormick |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:53:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Proposal: Make developer profiles more difficult to select |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:39:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ICC Profile |
Adam Stylinski |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:16:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ICC Profile |
Michael Hammer |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:01:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ICC Profile |
Rémi Cardona |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:52:20 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: mozcoreconf-2.eclass |
Raúl Porcel |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:28:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: ICC Profile |
Duncan |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:51:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] system set no longer in part of world set |
Alec Warner |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:11:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] system set no longer in part of world set |
Markus Rothe |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:21:35 |
Archives