| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review) |
Mart Raudsepp |
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:03:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Mart Raudsepp |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:38:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Mart Raudsepp |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:26:02 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Duncan |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:44:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review) |
Brian Harring |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:18:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] eqawarn for main tree |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:18:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Amazon.com - Your Cancellation (5773-3704679-523687) |
order-update@××××××.com |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:05:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:28:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:21:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:10:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:08:58 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-fs/btrfs |
Joe Peterson |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:19:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:54:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:49:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:08:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Doktor Notor |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:45:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Matti Bickel |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:34:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:25:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Theo Chatzimichos |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:06:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:47:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Matti Bickel |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:17:52 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Ryan Hill |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:10:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Ryan Hill |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:58:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:47:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] eqawarn for main tree |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:28:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
Ravi Pinjala |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:49:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Jeremy Olexa |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Petteri Räty |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:56:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:54:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] eqawarn for main tree |
Petteri Räty |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:40:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:40:12 |
| [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Petteri Räty |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
Angelo Arrifano |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:56:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:40:03 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Duncan |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:34:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:33:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:29:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
Matti Bickel |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:26:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Maciej Mrozowski |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:24:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
Jeremy Olexa |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:14:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
Matti Bickel |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:00:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
justin |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:42:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:30:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:17:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:12:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Alexis Ballier |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:59:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Ben de Groot |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:47:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
Angelo Arrifano |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:47:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Denis Dupeyron |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:46:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:36:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ebuild function to show package changelog |
Angelo Arrifano |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:12:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages |
Robert Bradbury |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:18:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Theo Chatzimichos |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:47:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Mart Raudsepp |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:37:39 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Duncan |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:00:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Richard Freeman |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:46:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Ben de Groot |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:20:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Alec Warner |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:53:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Mart Raudsepp |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:21:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
Alec Warner |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:32:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:31:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] N00b question |
Michele Noberasco |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:17:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] N00b question |
Ben de Groot |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:36:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] N00b question |
Michele Noberasco |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:01:39 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: How about a monthly bumpday? |
Ryan Hill |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:57:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Jeroen Roovers |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:10:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
Jacob Godserv |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:34:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review |
Ben de Groot |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:37:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
Ben de Groot |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:25:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:49:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:25:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:13:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:02:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:58:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:32:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:27:16 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Duncan |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:18:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Richard Freeman |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:05:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Mark Loeser |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:04:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
Ben de Groot |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:43:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Ben de Groot |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:34:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Duncan |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:22:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:43:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages |
Dawid Węgliński |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:40:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo calendar for tracking Gentoo events |
Roy Bamford |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:21:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:51:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Alec Warner |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:11:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:43:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:33:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:24:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The feature patch mess in the webalizer ebuild (and how to deal with it) |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:21:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:19:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer |
Benedikt Böhm |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:17:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config needs a new maintainer |
Maciej Mrozowski |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:09:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:03:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Mark Loeser |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:36:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass for x11 packages |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:14:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday? |
Ben de Groot |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:00:36 |
Archives