Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Enrico Weigelt |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:01:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:36:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:36:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:29:32 |
[gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:06:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Enrico Weigelt |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:04:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:35:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The /etc/portage/env profile.bashrc hack |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:08:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:03:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:34:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Rémi Cardona |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:18:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:33:24 |
[gentoo-dev] Migrate from qt4.eclass to qt4-r2 |
Markos Chandras |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:56:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:52:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:48:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:42:15 |
[gentoo-dev] ccache causing problems |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:07:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Rémi Cardona |
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:13:28 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:39:49 |
[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: app-text/manedit |
Paul Varner |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:21:57 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing |
Christian Faulhammer |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:36:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:58:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:32:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Paul Varner |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:19:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:45:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing |
Matti Bickel |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:34:52 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:35 |
[gentoo-dev] deblobbing kernel sources redux (ATTN all overlays with kernel sources packages) |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:08:44 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-04-25 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:15:28 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:04:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Benedikt Böhm |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:43:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Angelo Arrifano |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:10:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Yuri Vasilevski |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:34:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:23:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Daniel Pielmeier |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:43:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:10:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Richard Freeman |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:04:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Alec Warner |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:01:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Brian Harring |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:47:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:34:16 |
[gentoo-dev] [RFC][NEW] Utility to find orphaned files |
Angelo Arrifano |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:19:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Roy Bamford |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:55:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Alistair Bush |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:42:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:14:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Petteri Räty |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:11:24 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:03:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Zac Medico |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 06:17:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] The /etc/portage/env profile.bashrc hack |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:44:55 |
[gentoo-dev] The /etc/portage/env profile.bashrc hack |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:42:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Alexis Ballier |
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:14:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Arun Raghavan |
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:11:02 |
[gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits |
Petteri Räty |
Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:41:20 |
[gentoo-dev] Gnome 2.28 stabilization news item |
Pacho Ramos |
Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:34:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
James Cloos |
Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:04:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:03:47 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-chemistry/pynmr |
justin |
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:08:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists |
Markos Chandras |
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:05:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:28:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Luca Barbato |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:03:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Luca Barbato |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:03:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists |
Vincent Launchbury |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:00:43 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists |
Jeremy Olexa |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:52:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2010-04-21 |
Jeremy Olexa |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:47:23 |
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2010-04-21 |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:44:53 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Torsten Veller |
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:50:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Harald van Dijk |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:46:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
James Cloos |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:07:00 |
[gentoo-dev] static builds, static-libs useflag and indirect dependencies |
Alexis Ballier |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:51:09 |
[gentoo-dev] All gains in length and width are 100% permanent in clinical trials. |
MaxGentleman Supplements |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:28:59 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-04-18 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:15:32 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:15:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass |
Theo Chatzimichos |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:30:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass |
Tomáš Chvátal |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:15:43 |
[gentoo-dev] qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass |
Nikos Chantziaras |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:10:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/noscript |
Róbert Čerňanský |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:41:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/noscript |
volkmar@g.o |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:16:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 07:45:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
James Cloos |
Sun, 18 Apr 2010 03:53:09 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Torsten Veller |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:09:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 07:14:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 03:31:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:28:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
James Cloos |
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:25:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
James Cloos |
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:02:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [looking-for-man-power] Packaging RedHat/Fedora tools and libs |
Fabio Erculiani |
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:24:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme |
Denis Dupeyron |
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:35:14 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:34:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy needed.. for a non-dev maintainer on net-news/liferea |
Victor Ostorga |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:11:28 |
[gentoo-dev] proxy needed.. for a non-dev maintainer on net-news/liferea |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:31:58 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Multiple emerges in parallel (was: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel) |
Duncan |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:48:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple emerges in parallel (was: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:35:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple emerges in parallel (was: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel) |
Brian Harring |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:12:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple emerges in parallel (was: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:20:32 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Duncan |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:03:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:58:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation |
Matti Bickel |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:08:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Brian Harring |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:04:30 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Duncan |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:07:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel |
Justin |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:46:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:40:14 |