Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Brian Harring |
Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:19:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Zac Medico |
Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:14:16 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
Jonathan Callen |
Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:12:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass |
James Cloos |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:45:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:49:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Róbert Čerňanský |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:44:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch |
Jeroen Roovers |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:28:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't turn this into a pissing match. (was: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:02:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't turn this into a pissing match. (was: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative) |
Dror Levin |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:58:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:55:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Dror Levin |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:40:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't turn this into a pissing match. (was: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:32:36 |
[gentoo-dev] Please don't turn this into a pissing match. (was: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative) |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:23:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
David Leverton |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:05:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org |
Vincent Launchbury |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:54:14 |
[gentoo-dev] are hardened-sources maintained? |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:43:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:50:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:45:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:40:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:23:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:20:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:02:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:49:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:42:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:20:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:10:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:58:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:41:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:33:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org |
Sebastian Pipping |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:02:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:45:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:26:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org |
Brian Harring |
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:16:20 |