Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Cyprien Nicolas |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 10:18:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 08:36:22 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Stable Python stage repair thread |
Torsten Veller |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 08:20:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Peter Volkov |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:50:54 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 04:57:59 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:31:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:47:50 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:42:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:35:33 |
[gentoo-dev] [rfc] Sane defaults for USE_PYTHON, patch to python eclass |
Sebastian Pipping |
Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:24:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:26:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Cyprien Nicolas |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:55:09 |
[gentoo-dev] eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds |
Gilles Dartiguelongue |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:27:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Richard Freeman |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:34:03 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Matthew Summers |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:24:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:36:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:19:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:36:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:29:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:24:34 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:13:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:08:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Peter Volkov |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:51:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:50:52 |
[gentoo-dev] [Volunteers needed] Communicating use (and existence) of USE_PYTHON |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:35:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread |
Sebastian Pipping |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:23:46 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:46:16 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:37:44 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:26:38 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:54:07 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:49:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Petteri Räty |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:42:02 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:32:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Petteri Räty |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:25:06 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:39:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Pacho Ramos |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:54:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking <automake-1.9? |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:59:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking <automake-1.9? |
Petteri Räty |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:20:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking <automake-1.9? |
justin |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:05:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking <automake-1.9? |
justin |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 07:48:11 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 02:36:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking <automake-1.9? |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:46:23 |
[gentoo-dev] Masking <automake-1.9? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:04:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:20:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:00:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:57:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:54:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:48:30 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:45:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:44:39 |
[gentoo-dev] net-im/ekg2 and the ssl/openssl/gnutls flags |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:33:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Joshua Saddler |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:24:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Jeremy Olexa |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:09:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:59:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:40:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Joshua Saddler |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:35:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Richard Freeman |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:33:32 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:31:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Thomas Sachau |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:24:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Thomas Sachau |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:16:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Alec Warner |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:14:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:11:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:12:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Fabian Groffen |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:06:31 |
[gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage |
Thomas Sachau |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:55:34 |
[gentoo-dev] Stable Python stage repair thread |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:54:23 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:17:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Thomas Kahle |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:07:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Sebastian Pipping |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:29:08 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:36:53 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:35:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Thilo Bangert |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:15:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Peter Volkov |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:03:35 |
[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 102 bugs |
Alex Alexander |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:00:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:22:43 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:03:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Please test what you bump |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 03:33:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:56:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Matt Turner |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:47:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:26:43 |
[gentoo-dev] Maintainer notes in metadata.xml? |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:03:08 |