Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Chris Coleman |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:52:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:32:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:28:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:01:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:48:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:47:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: an eclass to handle optional runtime depends |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:20:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Raúl Porcel |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:04:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: an eclass to handle optional runtime depends |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:34:10 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: an eclass to handle optional runtime depends |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:26:56 |
[gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo |
Anthony G. Basile |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:44:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:23:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Kacper Kowalik |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:23:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: removing ebuilds |
Ryan Hill |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:14:17 |
[gentoo-dev] removing ebuilds |
Michael Sterrett |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:30:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:22:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
netfab |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:16:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Christopher Head |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:35:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 08:19:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
netfab |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 07:21:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
William Hubbs |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:57:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:43:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:00:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Duncan |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:02:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
William Hubbs |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:18:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:45:53 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: Changing portage's unpack behavior for non-tar files compressed with gz|Z|z|bz2|bz|lzma|xz extensions |
Zac Medico |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:43:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
William Hubbs |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:05:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
DarKRaveR |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:05:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:50:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
David Leverton |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:58:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:43:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:39:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
David Leverton |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:21:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Amadeusz Żołnowski |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:13:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:10:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:02:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:30:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:30:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:58:41 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Duncan |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:01:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:50:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:40:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:40:42 |
[gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? |
Samuli Suominen |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:31:11 |
[gentoo-dev] EKOPath/Path64 compiler ebuilds + support |
"C. Bergström" |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:47:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Rafael Goncalves Martins |
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:28:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:12:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:08:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Thomas Sachau |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:25:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:43:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:33:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Petteri Räty |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:42:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:30:46 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Donnie Berkholz |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:22:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Rafael Goncalves Martins |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:08:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:03:29 |
[gentoo-dev] Turning eclasses upside down with new EAPIs (the python eclasses) |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:39:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel config checks in simple packages (not kernel modules) |
Robin H. Johnson |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:45:40 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Kernel config checks in simple packages (not kernel modules) |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:27:26 |
[gentoo-dev] Kernel config checks in simple packages (not kernel modules) |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:08:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:07:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:05:18 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:02:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:03:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:31:17 |
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-libs/libsigc++:1.0 |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:44:10 |
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-libs/libicq2000 |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:40:46 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2011-07-24 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:25:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Nirbheek Chauhan |
Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:36:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Arun Raghavan |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:35:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:20:31 |
[gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated |
Stanislav Ochotnicky |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:12:10 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Marc Schiffbauer |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:40:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:18:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:59:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:56:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:34:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Alex Alexander |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:31:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Marc Schiffbauer |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:21:51 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Maxim Koltsov |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:57:41 |
[gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass |
Maxim Koltsov |
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:50:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due bangert retirement |
Thomas Beierlein |
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:30:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement |
Christoph Mende |
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:03:21 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites app-accessibility/speechd |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:08:27 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due bangert retirement |
Krzysztof Pawlik |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:16:19 |
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due bangert retirement |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:41:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due truedfx retirement |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:34:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due truedfx retirement |
Paul Varner |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:28:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due truedfx retirement |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:27:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement |
Dane Smith |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:00:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Voting on adding Leechcraft to the tree |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:52:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due truedfx retirement |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:48:38 |
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due truedfx retirement |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:35:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Voting on adding Leechcraft to the tree |
Georg Rudoy |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:12:38 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/freepops |
Eray Aslan |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:11:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement |
Christoph Mende |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:07:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Voting on adding Leechcraft to the tree |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:58:22 |
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due Carlo retirement |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:47:43 |
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: app-portage/meatoo |
Pacho Ramos |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:38:35 |