| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Peter Stuge |
Thu, 31 May 2012 22:29:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 31 May 2012 22:05:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 31 May 2012 22:05:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 31 May 2012 22:00:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Kent Fredric |
Thu, 31 May 2012 21:53:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 31 May 2012 21:07:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 31 May 2012 20:58:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michael Orlitzky |
Thu, 31 May 2012 20:29:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Duncan |
Thu, 31 May 2012 20:28:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 31 May 2012 20:09:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:59:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:56:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Alexey Shvetsov |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:53:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] last rites: games-util/nforenum |
Michael Sterrett |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:35:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:32:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:30:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
William Hubbs |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:19:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 31 May 2012 19:14:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 31 May 2012 17:49:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Sébastien Fabbro |
Thu, 31 May 2012 17:09:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 31 May 2012 16:51:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 31 May 2012 16:50:24 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce prune_libtool_files(). |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:55:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:23:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Peter Stuge |
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:19:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Aaron W. Swenson |
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:06:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 31 May 2012 11:40:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 31 May 2012 06:09:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 31 May 2012 05:46:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 30 May 2012 22:31:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Michael Orlitzky |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:59:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:57:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:42:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:25:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:22:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:20:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 30 May 2012 21:13:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Wed, 30 May 2012 20:32:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Virtual for awk implementation |
Florian Philipp |
Wed, 30 May 2012 18:41:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Robin H. Johnson |
Wed, 30 May 2012 18:34:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Virtual for awk implementation |
Florian Philipp |
Wed, 30 May 2012 18:30:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Justin |
Wed, 30 May 2012 18:13:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Wed, 30 May 2012 17:18:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 30 May 2012 17:16:00 |
| [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal? |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 30 May 2012 17:01:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Aaron W. Swenson |
Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Tobias Klausmann |
Wed, 30 May 2012 16:54:34 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Duncan |
Wed, 30 May 2012 13:08:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 30 May 2012 11:33:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Wed, 30 May 2012 10:17:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Duncan |
Wed, 30 May 2012 09:40:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 30 May 2012 01:55:57 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Hilco Wijbenga |
Wed, 30 May 2012 01:01:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Zac Medico |
Wed, 30 May 2012 00:39:49 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Virtual for awk implementation |
Christoph Junghans |
Wed, 30 May 2012 00:12:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Richard Yao |
Tue, 29 May 2012 23:24:48 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 29 May 2012 22:13:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 29 May 2012 22:10:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Hilco Wijbenga |
Tue, 29 May 2012 21:48:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 29 May 2012 20:33:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Michael Orlitzky |
Tue, 29 May 2012 20:23:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 29 May 2012 20:06:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: allow EAPI=4 |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 29 May 2012 20:01:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 29 May 2012 19:59:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Michael Orlitzky |
Tue, 29 May 2012 19:48:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Ralph Sennhauser |
Tue, 29 May 2012 19:46:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: allow EAPI=4 |
hasufell |
Tue, 29 May 2012 19:39:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: allow EAPI=4 |
Sergei Trofimovich |
Tue, 29 May 2012 18:56:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Jeff Horelick |
Tue, 29 May 2012 17:11:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
hasufell |
Tue, 29 May 2012 16:31:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 29 May 2012 15:24:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
hasufell |
Tue, 29 May 2012 15:01:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 29 May 2012 14:51:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Steven J Long |
Tue, 29 May 2012 14:22:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 29 May 2012 14:13:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Steven J Long |
Tue, 29 May 2012 13:45:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 29 May 2012 09:06:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Richard Yao |
Tue, 29 May 2012 09:00:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: trivial chromium.eclass patch |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 29 May 2012 08:48:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Agostino Sarubbo |
Tue, 29 May 2012 08:45:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] suspicious code in gnustep eclasses |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
Tue, 29 May 2012 08:07:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 29 May 2012 01:59:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Maxim Kammerer |
Tue, 29 May 2012 01:10:39 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Duncan |
Mon, 28 May 2012 23:57:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Michael Weber |
Mon, 28 May 2012 23:18:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Davide Pesavento |
Mon, 28 May 2012 21:53:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Mon, 28 May 2012 21:46:55 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default? |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 28 May 2012 21:35:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 28 May 2012 20:51:58 |
| [gentoo-dev] net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Mon, 28 May 2012 18:57:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: OpenRC Networking Scripts |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Mon, 28 May 2012 15:58:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 28 May 2012 09:04:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 28 May 2012 09:03:42 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use. |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 28 May 2012 07:59:48 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-05-27 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 28 May 2012 00:26:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Zac Medico |
Mon, 28 May 2012 00:18:02 |
| [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/libusbx:1 the default provider for virtual/libusb:1 (for ~arch) |
Samuli Suominen |
Sun, 27 May 2012 18:17:20 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: KOffice |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Sun, 27 May 2012 17:19:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: OpenRC Networking Scripts |
William Hubbs |
Sun, 27 May 2012 14:57:46 |
Archives