| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once |
Zac Medico |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:53:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:03:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:26:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once |
Michael Mol |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:17:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:07:07 |
| [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once |
Jörg Schaible |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:51:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:38:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:37:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:25:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:13:37 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Duncan |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:50:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:40:55 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Duncan |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:30:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:25:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:47:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
vivo75@×××××.com |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:43:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:12:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPANDs for uWSGI: UWSGI_LANGUAGES, UWSGI_PLUGINS and plans for uwsgi-2 |
Tiziano Müller |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:01:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Duncan |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:30:40 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:46:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Establishing Gentoo patch policy to keep our patches consistent and clean |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:34:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 01:56:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
vivo75@×××××.com |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:48:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:12:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:27:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:22:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:00:02 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:53:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:24:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:29:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:17:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:09:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:49:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:36:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cartesian product extension to keyword system |
Jeroen Roovers |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:43:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Useflags: xsl vs xslt |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:12:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cartesian product extension to keyword system |
heroxbd |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:31:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cartesian product extension to keyword system |
heroxbd |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:26:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:21:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cartesian product extension to keyword system |
Ben de Groot |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cartesian product extension to keyword system |
Fabian Groffen |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:39:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] RFC: cartesian product extension to keyword system |
heroxbd |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:06 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? |
Michał Górny |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 05:56:12 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Useflags: xsl vs xslt |
Ryan Hill |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:23:22 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-04-28 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:25:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: New USE_EXPAND: CLAWS_MAIL_PLUGINS |
Christian Faulhammer |
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:26:40 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/timidity-shompatches |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:57:08 |
| [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/duconv |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:28:03 |
| [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:26:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH bash-completion-r1] Introduce get_bashcompdir() to obtain bash-completion dir. |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:12:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH bash-completion-r1] Introduce get_bashcompdir() to obtain bash-completion dir. |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:08:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH bash-completion-r1] Introduce get_bashcompdir() to obtain bash-completion dir. |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:08:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH bash-completion-r1] Introduce get_bashcompdir() to obtain bash-completion dir. |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 07:14:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH bash-completion-r1] Introduce get_bashcompdir() to obtain bash-completion dir. |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 05:45:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Duncan |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:41:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Alec Warner |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:23:08 |
| [gentoo-dev] new arm box for devs |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:59:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:57:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Michael Weber |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:55:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:53:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:41:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:35:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:24:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:23:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:04:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:54:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Mike Frysinger |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:44:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:27:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:15:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:12:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:27:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:19:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:15:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:11:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:57:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
»Q« |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:24:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:19:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86 |
Thomas Sachau |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:17:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Peter Stuge |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:15:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:05:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Luca Barbato |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:15:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Michael Mol |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:20:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] OldNet out of OpenRC: as the requester |
Alexander Berntsen |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:12:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Tobias Klausmann |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:58:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Tobias Klausmann |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:44:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Tobias Klausmann |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:41:26 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Duncan |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:37:44 |
| [gentoo-dev] OldNet out of OpenRC: as the requester |
Robin H. Johnson |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:49:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Ambroz Bizjak |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:15:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Peter Stuge |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:12:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:07:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Carlos Silva |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:51:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Duncan |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:16:16 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Steven J. Long |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:34:19 |
| [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16.0 stabilization train |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:12:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
vivo75@×××××.com |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:10:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Mike Frysinger |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:08:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
Rich Freeman |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:54:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC |
G.Wolfe Woodbury |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:27:49 |
Archives