Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Ben Kohler |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:02:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [3/6]: a shitload of in-source doc |
hasufell |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:02:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks |
hasufell |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:50:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [0/6]: de-headerization |
hasufell |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:48:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:47:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [6/6]: update authorship metadata |
hasufell |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:45:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [2/6]: add frob for consumers to disable automagic header wrapping |
hasufell |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:37:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks |
hasufell |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:35:47 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Duncan |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:29:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:28:43 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [6/6]: update authorship metadata |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:21:52 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [5/6]: add frob to control phase parallelization |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:21:23 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:20:50 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [3/6]: a shitload of in-source doc |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:20:19 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [1/6]: some debug-print-function boilerplate |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:19:45 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [2/6]: add frob for consumers to disable automagic header wrapping |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:19:13 |
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [0/6]: de-headerization |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:18:33 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Paul Tagliamonte |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:14:38 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:09:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:07:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Alexander Tsoy |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:06:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:04:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Paul Tagliamonte |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:56:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:53:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Chris Reffett |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:48:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
Alon Bar-Lev |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:47:56 |
[gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:41:22 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Markos Chandras |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:31:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Michael Orlitzky |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:25:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Sven Vermeulen |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:22:44 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Steven J. Long |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:41:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
William Hubbs |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:58:19 |
RE: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Paul B. Henson |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:18:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:36:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Jeff Horelick |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:41:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Lars Wendler |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:34:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:07:03 |
[gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? |
Pacho Ramos |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:55:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:49:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:23:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:33:53 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:25:08 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Martin Vaeth |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:20 |
[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-java/jdictrayapi |
Michael Sterrett |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:33:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:34:00 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:33:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Patrick Lauer |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:27:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:32:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not |
Luca Barbato |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:28:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:54:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:49:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:19:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:06:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:28:36 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:48:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:25:50 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:21:26 |
[gentoo-dev] About pam herd status |
Pacho Ramos |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:20:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:57:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:53:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
heroxbd@g.o |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 03:19:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:56:08 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
heroxbd@g.o |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:37:23 |
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-12-08 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:25:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:21:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:12:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Patrick Lauer |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:55:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
William Hubbs |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:32:09 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
William Hubbs |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:26:03 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:02:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:54:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:32:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:31:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:30:49 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:26:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:25:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:23:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:22:05 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:17:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:07:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:01:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:49:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:39:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Ulrich Mueller |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:14:58 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:56:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:48:34 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Pacho Ramos |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:26:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:19:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:17:12 |
[gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:11:28 |
[gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 16:57:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Peter Stuge |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 02:35:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not |
heroxbd@g.o |
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:44:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:26:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not |
yac |
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 22:35:41 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] |
lists |
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:39:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Peter Stuge |
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:04:13 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up |
Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina |
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:21:46 |