Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in December 2013

Subject From Date
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Ben Kohler Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:02:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [3/6]: a shitload of in-source doc hasufell Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:02:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks hasufell Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:50:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [0/6]: de-headerization hasufell Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:48:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks Ulrich Mueller Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:47:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [6/6]: update authorship metadata hasufell Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:45:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [2/6]: add frob for consumers to disable automagic header wrapping hasufell Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:37:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks hasufell Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:35:47
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Duncan Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:29:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Rich Freeman Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:28:43
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [6/6]: update authorship metadata Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:21:52
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [5/6]: add frob to control phase parallelization Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:21:23
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [4/6]: ubiquitous multilib-<phase>-all callbacks Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:20:50
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [3/6]: a shitload of in-source doc Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:20:19
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [1/6]: some debug-print-function boilerplate Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:19:45
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [2/6]: add frob for consumers to disable automagic header wrapping Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:19:13
[gentoo-dev] some multilib-minimal enhancements [0/6]: de-headerization Greg Turner Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:18:33
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Paul Tagliamonte Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:14:38
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Markos Chandras Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:09:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Peter Stuge Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:07:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Alexander Tsoy Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:06:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC William Hubbs Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:04:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Paul Tagliamonte Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:56:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Markos Chandras Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:53:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Chris Reffett Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:48:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC Alon Bar-Lev Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:47:56
[gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC William Hubbs Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:41:22
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Markos Chandras Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Mike Gilbert Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Peter Stuge Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:31:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Michael Orlitzky Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:25:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Sven Vermeulen Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:22:44
[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Steven J. Long Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:41:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up William Hubbs Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:58:19
RE: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Paul B. Henson Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:18:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:36:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Jeff Horelick Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:41:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Lars Wendler Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:34:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ian Stakenvicius Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:07:03
[gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? Pacho Ramos Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:55:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Steev Klimaszewski Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:49:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rich Freeman Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:23:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Steev Klimaszewski Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:33:53
[gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ulrich Mueller Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:25:08
[gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Martin Vaeth Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:20
[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-java/jdictrayapi Michael Sterrett Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:33:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rich Freeman Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:34:00
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:33:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Patrick Lauer Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:27:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status Markos Chandras Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:32:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not Luca Barbato Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:28:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:54:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Steev Klimaszewski Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:49:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ulrich Mueller Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:19:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Rich Freeman Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:06:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rich Freeman Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:28:36
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:48:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status Andreas K. Huettel Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:25:50
[gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status Diego Elio Pettenò Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:21:26
[gentoo-dev] About pam herd status Pacho Ramos Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:20:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:57:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Sergey Popov Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:53:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? heroxbd@g.o Mon, 09 Dec 2013 03:19:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Rich Freeman Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:56:08
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? heroxbd@g.o Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:37:23
[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-12-08 23h59 UTC Robin H. Johnson Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:25:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Rich Freeman Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:21:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:12:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Patrick Lauer Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:55:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up William Hubbs Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:32:09
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up William Hubbs Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:26:03
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:02:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Michał Górny Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:54:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:32:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ulrich Mueller Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:31:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:30:49
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:26:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:25:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:23:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ulrich Mueller Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:22:05
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Rich Freeman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:17:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:07:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ulrich Mueller Sun, 08 Dec 2013 20:01:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ciaran McCreesh Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:49:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Rich Freeman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:39:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Ulrich Mueller Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:14:58
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Rich Freeman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:56:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:48:34
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Pacho Ramos Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:26:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Andreas K. Huettel Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:19:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Michał Górny Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:17:12
[gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:11:28
[gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman Sun, 08 Dec 2013 16:57:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Peter Stuge Sun, 08 Dec 2013 02:35:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not heroxbd@g.o Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:44:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rich Freeman Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:26:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] python versioned libraries or not yac Sat, 07 Dec 2013 22:35:41
Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] lists Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:39:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Peter Stuge Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:04:13
Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:21:46