| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with XDG directories in ebuild environment |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:16:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with XDG directories in ebuild environment |
Pacho Ramos |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:00:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed |
Michael Orlitzky |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:52:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: rm unnecessary exports |
hasufell |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:00:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed |
Andrew Hamilton |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:23:14 |
| [gentoo-dev] Dealing with XDG directories in ebuild environment |
Mike Gilbert |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:13:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop net-analyzer/nagios-* to maintainer-needed |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:25:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:36:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:28:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Chris Reffett |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:10:47 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:36:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Markos Chandras |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:13:21 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Duncan |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 04:02:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:56:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:29:12 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:30:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:27:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:10:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:27:33 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steven J. Long |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:33:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 03:55:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 03:06:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:06:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:51:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Peter Stuge |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:42:38 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:39:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:58:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:14:58 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Steven J. Long |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:00:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:48:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Chris Reffett |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:36:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:29:17 |
| [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: add optfeature() function |
Chris Reffett |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:25:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:52:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:41:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:30:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:16:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:01:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:36:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alan McKinnon |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:06:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:42:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:54:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] A few packages up for grabs |
hasufell |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:35:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add a KEYWORD representing any arch |
Jeroen Roovers |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:05:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Jeroen Roovers |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:40:17 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] A few packages up for grabs |
Alex Xu |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:06:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Patrick Lauer |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:30:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alec Warner |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:58:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
hasufell |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:39:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
hasufell |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:36:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alan McKinnon |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:00:25 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:59:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Mike Frysinger |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:58:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] A few packages up for grabs |
Mike Gilbert |
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:55:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
hasufell |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:21:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:15:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:57:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Thomas Sachau |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:03:42 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:20:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Peter Stuge |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:17:03 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:13:09 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Peter Stuge |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:58:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:50:16 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:26:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:47:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:11:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:06:14 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:57:35 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:29:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alec Warner |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:27:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:46:44 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:19:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Markos Chandras |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:41:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add a KEYWORD representing any arch |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:27:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
William Hubbs |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:54:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Alexander Berntsen |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:18:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
William Hubbs |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:26:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword written in python from scratch |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:29:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alan McKinnon |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:10:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Rich Freeman |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:59:58 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword written in python from scratch |
Ulrich Mueller |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:16:32 |
| [gentoo-dev] new profiles.desc header documenting profile/keyword policy |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:23:32 |
| [gentoo-dev] updated s390 VMs |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:05:27 |
| [gentoo-dev] ekeyword written in python from scratch |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:01:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.18 heading to ~arch in next ~week |
Mike Frysinger |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:56:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:56:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:48:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Alec Warner |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:24:37 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Denis Dupeyron |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:23:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:06:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:02:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Tom Wijsman |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:48:30 |
| [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-01-19 23h59 UTC |
Robin H. Johnson |
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:25:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Hosting daily gx86 squashfs images and deltas |
Christopher Head |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:58:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Christopher Head |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:32:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
Denis Dupeyron |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:22:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.18 heading to ~arch in next ~week |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:07:34 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights |
hasufell |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:46:11 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/ocaml/files: ocaml-4.01.0-pkg-config-ncurses.patch ocaml-3.11.2-Fix-ocamlopt-w.r.t.-binutils-2.21.patch |
Alexis Ballier |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:02:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy |
Thomas Sachau |
Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:06:21 |
Archives