Subject |
From |
Date |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Duncan |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:15:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) |
David Leverton |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 21:57:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) |
William Hubbs |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:09:12 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:59:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:21:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:09:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Lars Wendler |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:01:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
hasufell |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:33:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:28:14 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Thomas D. |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:17:21 |
[gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) |
hasufell |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:59:56 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:31:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:24:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Anthony G. Basile |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:22:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:21:20 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:20:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
hasufell |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:59:52 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:47:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:44:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Lars Wendler |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:41:32 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Michael Palimaka |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:34:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Tom Wijsman |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:19:34 |
[gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? |
Samuli Suominen |
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:31:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
hasufell |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:23:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:10:39 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 12/12] Clarify which EGIT_CLONE_TYPE variables are set by who. |
Michał Górny |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:10:02 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
hasufell |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:53:41 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 11/11] Disable shallow clones of local repositories. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:43:26 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:34:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
Alex Xu |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:33:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:30:04 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 03/10] Properly support non-master default branch. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:26:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 03/10] Properly support non-master default branch. |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:22:40 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES git-r3] Clean up and different clone type support |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:20:06 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:18:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Joshua Kinard |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:25:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:03:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:47:32 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones. |
Alex Xu |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:40:04 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:05:10 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 10/10] Use '+'-refs to force updates on fetch. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:04:35 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 08/10] Auto-unshallow when fetch-by-commit is requested. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:03:59 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:03:20 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 06/10] Support single-branch mode. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:02:44 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 05/10] Introduce EGIT_CLONE_TYPE for future use. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:02:03 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 04/10] Support EGIT_MIRROR_URI to specify local git mirror. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:01:25 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 03/10] Properly support non-master default branch. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:00:48 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 02/10] Replace 'git fetch' checkout with more efficient pseudo-shared fetch. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:00:15 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 01/10] Clarify that ebuilds are not supposed to set EGIT3_STORE_DIR. |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:59:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour |
Ulrich Mueller |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:58:36 |
[gentoo-dev] [PATCHES git-r3] Clean up and different clone type support |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:56:28 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Peter Stuge |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:45:48 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Joshua Kinard |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:37:45 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour |
Samuli Suominen |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:33:15 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Thomas D. |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:49:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour |
Alec Warner |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:24:35 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:18:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler |
Georg Rudoy |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:56:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler |
Georg Rudoy |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:54:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:52:59 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler |
Dirkjan Ochtman |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:35:42 |
[gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler |
Georg Rudoy |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:26:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 23:15:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:05:44 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Lars Wendler |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:44:50 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Alex Xu |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:44:16 |
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-gfx/kgraphviewer |
Michael Palimaka |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:43:42 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Александр Берсенев |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:23:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: new global USE flag gtk3 |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:22:37 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Peter Stuge |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:46:37 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting |
Michael Palimaka |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:29:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:25:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:58:47 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: new global USE flag gtk3 |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:31:21 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Mike Gilbert |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:51:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour |
Ulrich Mueller |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:06:03 |
[gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:52:55 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:27:31 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Thomas D. |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:26:11 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:34:53 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types |
hasufell |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:33:07 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Joshua Kinard |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:18:24 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: new global USE flag gtk3 |
Alex Alexander |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:06:30 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Thomas D. |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:39:40 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Duncan |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:23:25 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:17:08 |
Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Joshua Kinard |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:16:17 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Joshua Kinard |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:03:23 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Steev Klimaszewski |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:27:29 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Joshua Kinard |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:13:07 |
[gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:45:57 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types |
Michał Górny |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:57:16 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Lars Wendler |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:39:09 |
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: runlevels in runit |
Duncan |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:57:53 |
Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Samuli Suominen |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:34:01 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
James Cloos |
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:16:19 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: runlevels in runit |
William Hubbs |
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:15:39 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types |
hasufell |
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:40:51 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Sergey Popov |
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:05:54 |
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
Lars Wendler |
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:02:39 |