Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev in February 2014

Subject From Date
[gentoo-dev] Re: Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Duncan Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:15:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) David Leverton Fri, 28 Feb 2014 21:57:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) William Hubbs Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:09:12
Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) Rich Freeman Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:59:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Samuli Suominen Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:21:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:09:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Lars Wendler Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:01:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? hasufell Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:33:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:28:14
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Thomas D. Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:17:21
[gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) hasufell Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:59:56
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Rich Freeman Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:31:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Samuli Suominen Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:24:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Anthony G. Basile Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:22:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Ian Stakenvicius Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:21:20
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Samuli Suominen Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:20:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? hasufell Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:59:52
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Samuli Suominen Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:47:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Samuli Suominen Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:44:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Lars Wendler Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:41:32
[gentoo-dev] Re: Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Michael Palimaka Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:34:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Tom Wijsman Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:19:34
[gentoo-dev] Possibility of overriding user defined INSTALL_MASK from an ebuild? Samuli Suominen Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:31:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. hasufell Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:23:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. Michał Górny Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:10:39
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 12/12] Clarify which EGIT_CLONE_TYPE variables are set by who. Michał Górny Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:10:02
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. hasufell Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:53:41
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 11/11] Disable shallow clones of local repositories. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:43:26
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:34:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. Alex Xu Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:33:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. Ulrich Mueller Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:30:04
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 03/10] Properly support non-master default branch. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:26:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 03/10] Properly support non-master default branch. Ulrich Mueller Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:22:40
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES git-r3] Clean up and different clone type support Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:20:06
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Samuli Suominen Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:18:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Joshua Kinard Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:25:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Rich Freeman Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:03:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:47:32
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones. Alex Xu Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:40:04
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 09/10] Add EGIT_MIN_CLONE_TYPE to support ebuilds requiring greater clone type. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:05:10
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 10/10] Use '+'-refs to force updates on fetch. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:04:35
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 08/10] Auto-unshallow when fetch-by-commit is requested. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:03:59
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 07/10] Support shallow clones. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:03:20
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 06/10] Support single-branch mode. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:02:44
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 05/10] Introduce EGIT_CLONE_TYPE for future use. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:02:03
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 04/10] Support EGIT_MIRROR_URI to specify local git mirror. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:01:25
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 03/10] Properly support non-master default branch. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:00:48
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 02/10] Replace 'git fetch' checkout with more efficient pseudo-shared fetch. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:00:15
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-r3 01/10] Clarify that ebuilds are not supposed to set EGIT3_STORE_DIR. Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:59:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour Ulrich Mueller Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:58:36
[gentoo-dev] [PATCHES git-r3] Clean up and different clone type support Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:56:28
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Peter Stuge Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:45:48
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Joshua Kinard Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:37:45
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour Samuli Suominen Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:33:15
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Thomas D. Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:49:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour Alec Warner Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:24:35
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:18:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler Georg Rudoy Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:56:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler Georg Rudoy Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:54:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler Michał Górny Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:52:59
Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler Dirkjan Ochtman Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:35:42
[gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler Georg Rudoy Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:26:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types Michał Górny Tue, 25 Feb 2014 23:15:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:05:44
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Lars Wendler Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:44:50
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Alex Xu Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:44:16
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-gfx/kgraphviewer Michael Palimaka Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:43:42
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting Александр Берсенев Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:23:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: new global USE flag gtk3 Tom Wijsman Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:22:37
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Peter Stuge Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:46:37
[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting Michael Palimaka Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:29:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:25:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:58:47
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: new global USE flag gtk3 Samuli Suominen Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:31:21
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Mike Gilbert Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:51:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour Ulrich Mueller Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:06:03
[gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour Samuli Suominen Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:52:55
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Samuli Suominen Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:27:31
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Thomas D. Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:26:11
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Rich Freeman Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:34:53
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types hasufell Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:33:07
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Joshua Kinard Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:18:24
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: new global USE flag gtk3 Alex Alexander Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:06:30
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Thomas D. Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:39:40
[gentoo-dev] Re: News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Duncan Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:23:25
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Samuli Suominen Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:17:08
Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Joshua Kinard Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:16:17
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Joshua Kinard Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:03:23
Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Steev Klimaszewski Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:27:29
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Joshua Kinard Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:13:07
[gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade) Samuli Suominen Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:45:57
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types Michał Górny Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:57:16
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Lars Wendler Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:39:09
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: runlevels in runit Duncan Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:57:53
Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Samuli Suominen Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:34:01
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade James Cloos Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:16:19
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: runlevels in runit William Hubbs Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:15:39
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types hasufell Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:40:51
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Sergey Popov Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:05:54
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade Lars Wendler Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:02:39