| Subject |
From |
Date |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Matt Turner |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 19:14:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc) |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:30:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [epatch_user] Proposal: add possibility to tolerable-fail for some patches (plus add groupping support) |
Andreas K. Huettel |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:49:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [epatch_user] Proposal: add possibility to tolerable-fail for some patches (plus add groupping support) |
Tom Wijsman |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:21:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc) |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:14:28 |
| [gentoo-dev] Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc) |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 11:00:22 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [epatch_user] Proposal: add possibility to tolerable-fail for some patches (plus add groupping support) |
hasufell |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 10:04:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [epatch_user] Proposal: add possibility to tolerable-fail for some patches (plus add groupping support) |
Michał Górny |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 09:42:59 |
| [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [epatch_user] Proposal: add possibility to tolerable-fail for some patches (plus add groupping support) |
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 09:07:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
Rich Freeman |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 02:12:29 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:45:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Patrick Lauer |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:42:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:17:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
Jeroen Roovers |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:46:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
hasufell |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:56:28 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:50:54 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog |
hasufell |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:07:08 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Rich Freeman |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:00:24 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: svn{.overlays,}.gentoo.org hosting discontinued; git{.overlays,}.gentoo.org hosting merging |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:15:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Michael Palimaka |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:14:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:58:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:52:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:37:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:31:59 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
hasufell |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:25:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
hasufell |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:23:53 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:19:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:19:07 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
hasufell |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Michael Palimaka |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:10:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Ian Stakenvicius |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:05:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Georg Rudoy |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:04:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:57:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Alexandre Rostovtsev |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:51:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:45:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
hasufell |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:33:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:13:58 |
| [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? |
Michał Górny |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 14:42:10 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: svn{.overlays,}.gentoo.org hosting discontinued; git{.overlays,}.gentoo.org hosting merging |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:38:39 |
| [gentoo-dev] svn{.overlays,}.gentoo.org hosting discontinued; git{.overlays,}.gentoo.org hosting merging |
Robin H. Johnson |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 07:27:01 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Ryan Hill |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 06:20:53 |
| [gentoo-dev] python-utils-r1.eclass: fixes & improvements for python_fix_shebang |
Michał Górny |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:36:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Joshua Kinard |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:49:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Joshua Kinard |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:42:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Joshua Kinard |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:38:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Greg Turner |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:08:19 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Rich Freeman |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:38:39 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Jeroen Roovers |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:22:56 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Ryan Hill |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Magnus Granberg |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:13:36 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Greg Turner |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:45:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:46:15 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:34:49 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:22:05 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:45:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Duy Nguyen |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:36:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:30:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Jeroen Roovers |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:23:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Michał Górny |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:12:54 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Alexander Berntsen |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:59:40 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Alex Xu |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:55:10 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Rich Freeman |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:38:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Anthony G. Basile |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:32:46 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Creating a USE_EXPAND for ssl providers |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:12:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Sergey Popov |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:39:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Duncan |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:18:43 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Patrick Lauer |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:17:15 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:10:38 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:48:23 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:25:22 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Ryan Hill |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:21:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Greg Turner |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:55:51 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future etc. etc. |
Patrick Lauer |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:50:45 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Duy Nguyen |
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:49:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:16:04 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:05:45 |
| [gentoo-dev] The infinite git migration |
Patrick Lauer |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:59:41 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:32:20 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Sergei Trofimovich |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:37:30 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
hasufell |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:58:52 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Jeroen Roovers |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:19:11 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Andrew Savchenko |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:39:55 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Peter Stuge |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:11:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:09:33 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Andrew Savchenko |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:46:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Alexander Berntsen |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:49:27 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Andrew Savchenko |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:46:06 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Anthony G. Basile |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:48:56 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Anthony G. Basile |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:48:01 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Magnus Granberg |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:37:31 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Petteri Räty |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:54:32 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Jeroen Roovers |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:22:26 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Tom Wijsman |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:11:00 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Rich Freeman |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:44:50 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Alexander Berntsen |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:42:13 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Christopher Schwan |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:30:23 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Thomas Kahle |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:57:31 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project |
Duncan |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:47:21 |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project |
William Hubbs |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:05:50 |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector |
Ryan Hill |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 03:47:36 |
Archives