Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devhelp

From: James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-devhelp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:58:21
Message-Id: m339a6821d.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories by Thomas Sachau
1 >>>>> "TS" == Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> writes:
2
3 TS> I just tried libgit2 (dev-libs/libgit2-0.16.0) and it installs just fine
4 TS> for me, so i cannot reproduce this (base version for my portage is
5 TS> 2.2_alpha87), what are your versions of portage and libgit2?
6
7 As I implied by saying master, -9999. libgit2 is also 0.16.0.
8
9 I tried updating portage just before posting, the log says that was from
10 9997bb9c81e07 to 4a85888920244.
11
12 My last successful install of libgit2 was 0.15.0 back in October, so the
13 change which made portage start failing ebuilds which try to dodoc dirs
14 was done sometime in the last four months.
15
16 TS> P.S.: No need to cc me, i am subscribed to this list.
17
18 I'm used to lkml-style etiquette; include everyone who has posted in the
19 CC. It tends to be the norm on technical lists, and is what gnus does
20 by default if I reply to the copy sent directly. I (now) see that this
21 lists munges reply-to, so this reply honours that....
22
23 -JimC
24 --
25 James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>