| 1 |
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 12:35 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:34:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:27:32 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > | The point is that separate groups are a pointless complication that |
| 5 |
> > | won't help anything. That does not affect documenting things in the |
| 6 |
> > | least. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > No no. Separate groups reduces the likelihood that a few biased devrel |
| 9 |
> > members will be able to set themselves up as the judge, jury and |
| 10 |
> > executioner. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> How does separate groups address that? They're both drawn from devrel |
| 13 |
> members aren't they? Didn't you know we're actually one single-minded |
| 14 |
> conspiracy-driven hive mentality? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
did you not read his response or did you just go 'ciaran replied, it must be |
| 17 |
garbage' ? he said: |
| 18 |
larger sep groups *reduces* the likelihood that a few biased members can |
| 19 |
control the flow of the whole process |
| 20 |
-mike |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives