| 1 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 03:16:04PM EDT] |
| 2 |
> Personally, I'm still fond of my long-ago suggestion that the |
| 3 |
> judgement part of the process should be handled by |
| 4 |
> a randomly-selected group of devs, but I'm perfectly willing to |
| 5 |
> accept that such a proposal is unrealistic. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Jury duty makes sense to me. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Regarding the discussion at hand, this doesn't treat dmwaters' |
| 10 |
expressed concern, rather it might make the process slightly *more* |
| 11 |
complex. OTOH, Ferris says that the new system hasn't even been used |
| 12 |
yet, so I don't yet understand on what evidence the concern is based. |
| 13 |
:-/ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Regards, |
| 16 |
Aron |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Aron Griffis |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives