Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:35:45
Message-Id: 20050907163537.GA20495@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:34:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:27:32 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote:
3 > | The point is that separate groups are a pointless complication that
4 > | won't help anything. That does not affect documenting things in the
5 > | least.
6 >
7 > No no. Separate groups reduces the likelihood that a few biased devrel
8 > members will be able to set themselves up as the judge, jury and
9 > executioner.
10 >
11
12 How does separate groups address that? They're both drawn from devrel
13 members aren't they? Didn't you know we're actually one single-minded
14 conspiracy-driven hive mentality?
15
16 :)
17
18 --
19 Jon Portnoy
20 avenj/irc.freenode.net
21 --
22 gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>