Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 00:39:09
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.63.0509061937330.6803@monster
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc by Ciaran McCreesh
More like making it a bit easier for devrel to get things done. Trigger
happy? Not hardly, and if we ever did become that way, then even i would
think something is wrong there.

If the council did overrule devrel, i would hope that they at least
provided an explanation so that we understool the reasons why, and could
make things better, and improve.
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 01:35:15 +0100 > From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> > Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o > To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o > Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:54:01 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote: > | No, mostly it does a lot to accomplish castrating devrel and making > | it ineffective. > | > | We have a working council now, that means if somebody feels devrel > | is acting unfairly or not being open enough there's a body to appeal > | to. > > So you are aiming for a trigger-happy devrel that tries its hardest to > kick off anyone it feels like, whilst relying upon the council to keep > it honest? > > If it ever gets to the stage of the council overruling devrel, I'd hope > that the council would also impose sanctions against devrel to > discourage them from abusing their power again. If the council does > ever have to overrule devrel, it suggests that something is seriously > wrong with devrel's procedures... > >
-- Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - dmwaters@g.o Gentoo linux: -- gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list