1 |
More like making it a bit easier for devrel to get things done. Trigger |
2 |
happy? Not hardly, and if we ever did become that way, then even i would |
3 |
think something is wrong there. |
4 |
|
5 |
If the council did overrule devrel, i would hope that they at least |
6 |
provided an explanation so that we understool the reasons why, and could |
7 |
make things better, and improve. |
8 |
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 01:35:15 +0100 |
11 |
> From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
12 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
13 |
> To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
14 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc |
15 |
> |
16 |
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:54:01 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote: |
17 |
> | No, mostly it does a lot to accomplish castrating devrel and making |
18 |
> | it ineffective. |
19 |
> | |
20 |
> | We have a working council now, that means if somebody feels devrel |
21 |
> | is acting unfairly or not being open enough there's a body to appeal |
22 |
> | to. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> So you are aiming for a trigger-happy devrel that tries its hardest to |
25 |
> kick off anyone it feels like, whilst relying upon the council to keep |
26 |
> it honest? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> If it ever gets to the stage of the council overruling devrel, I'd hope |
29 |
> that the council would also impose sanctions against devrel to |
30 |
> discourage them from abusing their power again. If the council does |
31 |
> ever have to overrule devrel, it suggests that something is seriously |
32 |
> wrong with devrel's procedures... |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
38 |
dmwaters@g.o |
39 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |