1 |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:51:12PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 16:41 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote: |
3 |
> > The devrel members who first approached me on this think that this is |
4 |
> > too much red tape for something that 1, is literally probably going to |
5 |
> > almost never be used 2, it's going to take too long to do anything with, |
6 |
> > and take too long to get results that are going to make people happy, |
7 |
> > and 3 most of them agreed to this policy because at the time it looked |
8 |
> > like the best option. In looking back at it, it's not the best option, |
9 |
> > so they want something less complicated. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 1. If it is almost never used, where is the extra red-tape? |
13 |
|
14 |
The point is not taking forever and a day to respond when things do |
15 |
happen. |
16 |
|
17 |
> 2. Why is it going to take too long to get results? |
18 |
|
19 |
Because there will be endless meetings and discussions. |
20 |
|
21 |
> 3. What has changed to make it not look like the best option? |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
People took a step back from trying to just do whatever it takes to |
25 |
please the handful of "devrel == stalin" folks |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Jon Portnoy |
29 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |