| 1 |
My understanding is that a dev who is suspended loses all access to |
| 2 |
-core. Is that right? Assuming so, it occurs to me that if we expect |
| 3 |
the dev to come back (and I assume we do, or the dev would be expelled |
| 4 |
instead of suspended), then perhaps it would make more sense to only remove |
| 5 |
write access to -core, while leaving read access? An alternative would |
| 6 |
be if we archived -core, and the newly reinstated dev could then read |
| 7 |
the archives, but read-only access seems simpler. The rationale is that |
| 8 |
in those rare cases where suspended devs return, it benefits Gentoo if |
| 9 |
the suspended dev is able to stay up to date. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Thougnts or comments? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Thanks, |
| 14 |
g2boojum |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 18 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 19 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 20 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives