1 |
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 15:40 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote: |
2 |
> How does someone else decide the punishment ensure fair? Truely, i don't |
3 |
> see that that does not in a situation like this, at any rate. People can |
4 |
> still appeal the overall decision to the council, there's knowone |
5 |
> stopping them from it reguardless of wether it's a commitee that makes |
6 |
> the decision, or 2 seperate branches. |
7 |
|
8 |
It doesn't ensure 100% fairness as all systems can be abused. What |
9 |
having it separate does, is allow the people that are deciding the |
10 |
punishment be as impartial as possible. |
11 |
|
12 |
Putting it into context of receiving a speeding ticket. I don't want the |
13 |
police officer who writes me a ticket for speeding to be the one to |
14 |
determine that I'm guilty of speeding (he has already made that decision |
15 |
based upon writing me a ticket). I want a third party who can look at |
16 |
what I say the facts are and what the police officer says the facts are |
17 |
to make that decision. The third party helps to ensure that my side of |
18 |
the story is heard and weighed into consideration. That is what helps to |
19 |
ensure the fairness. |
20 |
|
21 |
Regards, |
22 |
Paul |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |