1 |
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 09:00 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> Paul Varner wrote: |
3 |
> > I then see a meeting where a panel looks at all of the evidence |
4 |
> > collected, asks for testimony if neccessary to reach a decision, and |
5 |
> > makes a decision. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If you think either of these will be resolved in one hour-long meeting |
8 |
> or similar, you're sadly mistaken. |
9 |
|
10 |
If the meetings are an a channel where everyone can talk, then I |
11 |
definitely see your point. |
12 |
|
13 |
However, If three people who are the only ones with a voice in the |
14 |
channel can't make a decision in an hour long meeting, then maybe the |
15 |
situation is complex enough to require more time. What is wrong with |
16 |
that? |
17 |
|
18 |
A public meeting doesn't mean that anybody can just show up and spout |
19 |
off. It means that they can attend and listen and if recoginized by |
20 |
those holding the meeting, then they can talk. |
21 |
|
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
Paul |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |